Man who killed wife sought ultimate sentence
By DOUG MCMURDO
REVIEW-JOURNAL
A man who asked the jury to give him the death penalty after it convicted him of killing his wife got his wish after less than two hours of deliberations Friday.
"He's a Muslim," said prosecutor Marc DiGiacomo of John Matthus Watson III, referring to a tenet of the faith that requires death for committing murder. "That's why he wanted the death penalty," he said about the retired teacher from Ontario, Calif.
Most Popular Stories
Las Vegas officer shoots, kills suspect while serving search warrant
Drama sets tone in 'Holly's World'
Retired teacher gets death penalty for wife's murder
Numbers don't lie: 320,655 people just can't be wrong
Prosecutors in case against high roller criticized
Man who fell from Laughlin hotel identified
Firefighters rescue mother, daughter, dogs from hundreds of bees
Angle not softening her views
Sinatra family loses Smithsonian effort
Supreme Court hears arguments in O.J. Simpson appeal
DiGiacomo believes Watson converted to Islam during the four years he was in custody at the Clark County Detention Center. But DiGiacomo and co-prosecutor Pam Weckerly said they asked jurors to give Watson the death penalty not because he asked them to but because he deserved society's ultimate punishment.
The jury found there were two requisite aggravating circumstances in the slaying: that Evie Watson was killed during the commission of a kidnapping and that she was tortured or mutilated.
Watson, 70, lured his wife to Las Vegas in July 2006, ostensibly to celebrate her 50th birthday. In reality, he had been plotting her murder for more than a month because she was going to leave him and he didn't want to have to give her half of the family assets, prosecutors said.
"They write books about these kinds of cases," said DiGiacomo, a veteran prosecutor.
Weckerly said Watson managed to save roughly $1 million over a 30-year career.
Her body has never been recovered, but Evie Watson's DNA was found in a shower drain at the Tuscany, in a room she was not supposed to be in as the room he rented for them was at Circus Circus.
He rented the room at the Tuscany with false identification. It was there that Watson shot his wife and then cut her up with a band saw .
In letters written from jail, Watson admitted to cooking and eating part of the body.
Weckerly described Watson as methodical, intelligent, manipulative, deceitful and dangerous, saying the murder was not typical of domestic violence murder cases.
"This is a little set apart," she said in telling jurors the killing was not a crime of passion, but one that was cold-blooded and calculated.
Jurors, in an emotional scene, met with the Watsons' three sons, all in their 20s, after the trial.
"We owe you so much," said Michael Watson.
"You don't owe us anything," said one juror who asked not to be identified.
Jurors told the men they fretted over giving their father the death penalty because they would then be without both parents.
Getting a murder conviction in a case with no body is difficult; getting a death penalty in one is almost unheard of.
For juror Justin Crenshaw, the compelling piece of evidence that led him to find Watson guilty Thursday, and subsequently give him the death penalty, was testimony regarding police finding Evie Watson's DNA in the Tuscany shower drain.
"That did it for me," he said. "There were some holes before that and I wasn't sure, but when we (deliberated) I kept thinking about her DNA being where she wasn't supposed to be."
Watson has a history with the law.
In 1967 he was arrested in Oklahoma after telling authorities he raped and killed a hitchhiker and dumped her body. But no charges were ever filed. Police couldn't find her body after an exhaustive search.
He was also arrested by the Secret Service after threatening President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s. He was arrested but not prosecuted.
A compilation of daily news articles from around the United States about deaths (including both people and animals) that appear to occur in the context of a past or present intimate relationship, focusing on 2009-present. (NOTE: this blog is limited to incidents that appear in the media and are captured by our search terms. We recognize this is not an exhaustive portrayal of all deaths resulting from intimate violence.) When is society going to realize intimate violence makes victims of us all?
No comments:
Post a Comment